Assignment help

新西兰商科assignment代写 大众汽车

2015年9月,大众汽车前首席执行官文德恩辞职,他表示不知道自己有任何不当行为,但承认为危机负责(Amelang和Wehrmann)。到2017年2月,他的声明被前大众董事会主席反驳,他声称文德恩早在丑闻爆发之前就已经被告知有缺陷的测试(Amelang和Wehrmann)。这一矛盾表明,大众至少有三次违反了自己的行为准则。首先是他们对VWGoA声誉的责任准则。它规定,雇员必须在他们的行动中保持最高水平的正直。即使有他们的行为是否足够道德的问题,他们也应该先咨询主管或人力资源部的人,然后再采取行动。基于这一矛盾,文德恩声称他不知道测试存在缺陷是在撒谎。他不仅在撒谎,而且在否认自己实际上知道多少信息,这与他自己所说的他要为过失排放危机负责的说法相矛盾。其次是他们的管理文化和合作守则。这表明在雇主和经理之间应该有一个清晰的沟通和信任的桥梁。雇主应该坦然地向经理提出任何与业务有关的问题,这样双方就可以一起努力找到有效的解决方案。管理人员也有义务适当监督其雇主的任何不当行为,并立即采取行动,以防止对公司的诚信和产品质量造成任何损害。前任首席执行官和他的前任员工之间缺乏沟通表明双方在沟通排放测试时意见都不一致。第三是他们的公平贸易守则。这个准则只是要求员工不要从事不公平的、欺骗的、误导人的商业原则。要么是这位前首席执行官无视自己对公众和环境的安全责任,故意允许发布有问题的车型,要么是他的员工没有对发动机存在的严重缺陷给予足够的压力。由于这些违规行为,双方都有责任为这三次违反大众的行为准则。

新西兰商科assignment代写 大众汽车

In September 2015, former VW CEO Winterkorn resigned from VW stating he was unaware of any personal wrongdoing but accepts responsibility for the crisis (Amelang and Wehrmann). By February 2017, his statement was contradicted by the former head of VW Board of Directors who claims CEO Winterkorn was informed of the faulty tests long before the scandal broke out (Amelang and Wehrmann). This contradiction shows at least three breaches of VW’s own Code of Conduct. First is their code of Responsibility for the Reputation of VWGoA. It states that employees must maintain the highest level of integrity in their actions. If there is even a question of whether their action is ethical enough or not, they should first consult a supervisor or someone in human resources before proceeding. Based on the contradiction, it is implied that CEO Winterkorn was lying when he stated he did not know of the faulty tests. Not only is he lying, he is contradicting his own words that he takes responsibility for the fault emissions crisis since he is in denial of how much information he actually knew. The second is their code of Management Culture and Collaboration. This states that there should be a clear bridge of communication and trust between the employer and manager. The employer should feel comfortable with coming up to the manager to speak on any matter/problem related to business so that both parties can work together to find an effective solution. Managers are also obligated to appropriately supervise their employers for any wrongdoing and act on such action immediately in order to prevent any damage to the company’s integrity and product quality. The lack of communication between the former CEO and his former employee shows that neither were on the same page when communicating emission tests. The third was is their code of Fair Trade Practices. This code just requires employees not to engage in unfair, deceptive, and misleading business principles. Either the former CEO ignored his responsibility of safety to the general public and the environment by knowingly allowing the release of faulty models, or his employee did not press hard enough on how seriously flawed the engines were. Due to these breaches, both parties are at fault for all three breaches of VW’s Code of Conduct.

本段内容来自网络 并不是我们的写手作品 请勿直接剽窃,查重100%,造成后果与本站无关。如需定制论文请记得联系我们。

发表评论

电子邮件地址不会被公开。 必填项已用*标注