本文试图通过快乐:第三帝国的消费主义和大众旅游，对雪莱·巴拉诺斯基的著作《力量》进行批判性回顾。报价、统计数据和例子是来自不同来源的确认,或经常对比,巴拉诺维斯基的发现她的书——三个主要地区的KdF作为政治工具的成功,美丽的影响劳动对工人的政权,通过快乐的作用强度的增加,旅游业在1930年代。对于这三点，Baranowski的工作有一些弱点和局限性。诚然，这篇文章对巴拉诺夫斯基的书持相当批判的观点。然而，大多数批评并不是针对作者的研究、数据、资料来源或方法，而是指向她的结论。因此，这篇文章不应该帮助减少第三帝国旅游这一主题的重要性。虽然巴拉诺夫斯基的书可能有改进的潜力，但它确实是第一个也是迄今为止最主要的依靠英语获得的力量的主要来源之一。这本书的意义进一步升高,当一个人认为KdF的主要档案在很大程度上摧毁了二战期间,和其他相关文件的主题旅游和受欢迎的上诉一个独裁政权通常很难研究和分析,作者在这本书的大部分内容,实际上已经设法保持一个有组织的,客观的和相当详细查看她的话题。综上所述，这篇文章所提出的观点可能有助于巴拉诺斯基的开创性研究，但即使没有他们，这本书仍然是第三帝国史学的有力补充。
新西兰动画学论文代写:第三帝国的消费主义
This essay has attempted to provide a critical review of Shelley Baranowski's book Strength through Joy: Consumerism and Mass Tourism in the Third Reich. Quotes, statistics and examples were drawn from different sources to confirm, or more often to contrast, Baranowski's findings in three main areas of her book - the success of KdF as a political tool, the impact of Beauty of Labour on workers' view of the regime and the role of Strength through Joy for the increase in tourism in the 1930s. For all three points, some weaknesses and limitations of Baranowski's work were pointed out. Admittedly, this essay has therefore taken a rather critical view of Baranowski's book. However, most criticism has been directed not towards the author's research, data, sources or methods of presentation, but rather towards her conclusions. Thus, this essay should not help diminish the importance of the book for the topic of tourism in the Third Reich. While Baranowski's book may have potential for improvement, it is certainly one of the first and so far major sources on Strength through Joy available in English. The significance of the book is further elevated when one considers that KdF's main archive and other related documents were largely destroyed during WWII, that the topic of tourism and popular appeal in a dictatorship are generally difficult to research and analyze, and that throughout most of the book the author has actually managed to preserve an organized, objective and fairly detailed view of her topic. In conclusion, a consideration of the points made in this essay may certainly contribute to Baranowski's pioneering study, but even without them the book still remains a strong addition to the Third Reich's historiography.
