简而言之，正如他们的名字所暗示的那样，认知语言学和认知语法视语言为认知的一个组成部分。概念是（不一致）是身体接地和普遍的想象力，个人和根本的社会。语言意义是概念性的，具有这些属性。它充分承认了社会互动中语言的基础，但坚持说，即使是它的交互功能也严重依赖于概念化。与正式的方法相比，认知语言学突出的是抵制语言和其他心理现象之间的界限，语法意义是示意性的。在极端情况下，它们只不过是适用于任何内容的认知能力。这些意义的图式越多，研究它们的难度就越大，但也就越有收获。语法分析事实上是概念分析的必要工具。在语法中，抽象出特定表达式的细节，我们更清楚地看到概念内容内在的心理运作。这些通常是对日常经验基本方面的模拟：概念原型固有的处理活动脱离了它们，并扩展到广泛的其他环境中。在这方面，语法反映了人类认知的一个基本特征。
新西兰管理学代写essay:认知语言学
In a nutshell, as their names suggest , cognitive linguistics and Cognitive Grammar view language as an integral part of cognition. Conceptualization is seen (without inconsistency) as being both physically grounded and pervasively imaginative, both individual and fundamentally social. Being conceptual in nature, linguistic meaning shares these properties. It fully acknowledges the grounding of language in social interaction, but insists that even its interactive function is critically dependent on conceptualization. Compared with formal approaches, cognitive linguistics stands out by resisting the imposition of boundaries between language and other psychological phenomena.Grammatical meanings are schematic. At the extreme, they are nothing more than cognitive abilities applicable to any content. The more schematic these meanings are, the harder it is to study them, but also the more rewarding. Grammatical analysis proves, in fact, to be an essential tool for conceptual analysis. In grammar, which abstracts away from the details of particular expressions, we see more clearly the mental operations immanent in their conceptual content. These often amount to simulations of basic aspects of everyday experience: processing activity inherent in conceptual archetypes is disengaged from them and extended to a broad range of other circumstances. In this respect, grammar reflects an essential feature of human cognition.
