在本次调查研究设计中，采用问卷调查的方法收集相关的、足够的信息。共有38个问题被用来征求教师对教学督导及其与专业发展的关系的看法。调查表分为四部分。第一部分主要关注教师的人口统计学、个人数据和上下文数据，包括15个问题。第二部分调查了教师对实际和理想管理方法的看法。这部分由7个问题组成。每一个关于各种监督方法的问题，都包括了每个监督实践的定义。第三节由11个问题组成，重点研究与教师对教学督导的反应有关的数据，第四节寻求有关教学督导与专业发展之间的联系的数据。本节包含5个项目。除了第一部分之外，受访者还被要求对Likert五级量表的问题做出回答，以表明他们对每个回答的赞同程度。调查的最后一部分提供了书面答复的机会，要求200名受访者就如何改进教学监督发表其他意见。会议记录了评论意见，并用来加强数据的表达和补充对调查结果的讨论。
新西兰汉密尔顿论文代写:教学督导
In this survey research design, questionnaire was used as an instrument to collect relevant and adequate information. A total of 38 questions were used to seek views of teachers concerning instructional supervision and its relationship with professional development. The questionnaire was organized in to four sections. Section one focused on teacher's demographic, personal, and contextual data and consisted of 15 questions. The second section sought data on teachers' perceptions of actual and ideal supervisory approaches. This section consisted of 7 questions. With each question about various approaches to supervision, a definition of each supervisory practice was included. Section three, which consisted of 11 question items, focused on data related to teachers' reactions to instructional supervision, and section four sought data on the connection of instructional supervision and professional development. This section contained 5 items. Apart from the first section, the respondents were asked to respond to questions on a five point Likert scale to indicate their level of agreement with each response. The opportunity for written responses was provided in the last part of the survey, requesting 200 respondents to share any other comments on ways in which instructional supervision could be improved. Comments were recorded and used to enhance the presentation of data and to complement the discussion of the findings.
