从这个观点出发，社会关系就不那么明显了，因为马克思认为劳动产品的价值关系与他们的物质属性没有联系。马克思的商品拜物教思想在这里被强调，因为它改变了商品和货币在市场交易中的交换方式，通过秘密地隐藏某人被利用来生产商品价值的事实。此外，马克思继续阐明人类对资本主义结构的异化，因为他认为人是通过“事物之间的关系的奇妙形式”被引入这个概念的。马克思认为，通过具体化，这些商品现在看作掩盖经济剥削的劳动者（主体）的工资和新产品价值是由工人自己创造的，在他的文章中，马克思巧妙地支撑着我们是多么的无知和剥削制度的低效的行为看的类比。他认为，从“外部物体到眼睛”，我们看到“光从一个物体到另一个物体的实际通过”，这意味着剥削工人的不是无形的，但我们只是选择不去看它，因为我们生活在一个受控制的社会中。在他的文章中马克思论证了社会生产关系和技术从这光的比喻我们可以认为是一种社会依赖资本主义吃需要对比；经济权否决所有的政治和社会秩序的活动。此外，如果把劳动从工作场所移走，资本的价值就会恶化，从而强调资产阶级实际上是如何依赖无产阶级的劳动力量的。
新西兰护理学代写论文:社会关系
Following on from this idea, the social relations become less apparent as Marx argues that the value relation between the products of labour has ‘no connection with their physical properties’. Marx’s idea of commodity fetishism is highlighted here as it transforms how the production of commodities and money are exchanged in the market trade through secretly hiding the fact that someone was exploited to produce that value of commodity. Furthermore, Marx continues to illuminate the human alienation of the capitalist structure as he states man is drawn into this concept by ‘the fantastic form of a relation between things’. Marx believes that through reification, these commodities now seen as objects obscure the economic exploitation of the labourer’s (subjects) wages and the new value of product created by the worker themselves.In his article, Marx cleverly underpins how we are ignorant to the inefficient and exploitive system with the analogy of the ‘act of seeing’. He argues that from the ‘external object to the eye’, we see an ‘actual passage of light from one thing to another’, which implies the exploitation of labourer’s is not invisible; but we just choose not to see it as we live in a controlled society. In his article Marx demonstrates a contrast between the social and technical relation production and from this light analogy we can argue that there is a need for social dependency that capitalism feeds off; in order for economic power to overrule all political and social activities. Furthermore, the value of capital would deteriorate if labour is removed from the workplace, thus highlighting how the bourgeoisie are in effect dependent upon the proletariat labour-power.
