在这一发现的基础上，社会网络的研究感兴趣的创新，往往涉及到新的和复杂的知识交流（Nonaka和Takeuchi，1995；帕沃拉，Lipponen，& Hakkarainen，2004），建议不要集中在一般网络。此外，我们的研究结果表明，有表达和仪器网络方面的关系之间的区别。因此，研究人员和从业者建议目标的仪器和表现关系的结构，这些网络可能会影响的速度和方便的信息传达通过其不同的渠道。不同的网络只有部分重叠，这意味着这些网络可以作为半独特的导体的知识，专业知识，社会支持，教材，和其他资源有价值的学校表现和教育变革。 关于构建社会网络的问题，最近的研究表明，即使仪器周围的社会网络内的建议，题材（科本&罗素，2008；海顿和学历，2007；学历，2006；斯皮兰和钻石，2006）。平均来说，教师发现找出对识字教学的建议比数学教学更多的同事，建议网络数学约三分之一低密度比素养（学历，2005）。此外，研究还表明，在调查的社会网络问题的顺序可能会影响网络社会的形态（Burt，1997；ferligoj和hlebec，1999；2009；Straits Pustejovsky和Spillane，，2000）。这些发现强调的重要性，精心取景和订购社交网络的问题，并考虑针对“正确”的社会网络的意义，以最大限度地发挥其潜力.
新西兰会计学论文代写:发现的基础
Building on this finding, social network studies interested in innovation, which often involves the exchange of new and complex knowledge (Nonaka & Takeuchi, 1995; Paavola, Lipponen, & Hakkarainen, 2004), are advised not to focus on such general networks. Furthermore, our findings indicate that there is a distinction between expressive and instrumental networks in regard to the configuration of relationships. Therefore, researchers and practitioners are advised to target both instrumental and expressive relationships as the structure of these networks may affect the speed and ease with which information is conveyed through its different channels. Different networks only partially overlap, which means that these networks may serve as semi-unique conductors of knowledge, expertise, social support, teaching materials, and other resources valuable to school performance and educational change In regard to framing social network questions, recent studies suggests that even within instrumental social networks around advice, the subject matters (Coburn & Russell, 2008; Hayton & Spillane, 2007; Spillane, 2006; Spillane & Diamond, 2006). On average, teachers were found to seek out more colleagues for advice on literacy instruction than on mathematics instruction, with advice networks for mathematics being about a third less dense than those for literacy (Spillane, 2005). Moreover, research also indicates that the order of social network questions in a survey may affect the shape of social networks (Burt, 1997; Ferligoj & Hlebec, 1999; Pustejovsky & Spillane, 2009; Straits, 2000). These findings emphasize the importance of carefully framing and ordering social networks questions and considering the significance of targeting the ‘right' social networks in order to maximize their potential
