Assignment help

新西兰惠灵顿代写:动物权利主张

玛丽·安妮·沃伦提出了一种动物权利主张,称为“弱势动物权利立场”。首先,我将描述沃伦对支持这一观点的立场和论据的描述。接下来,我将对沃伦的观点提出反对意见,即利用感知作为区别于其他因素的特征来促进有害的环境政策。那么,我认为有知觉的动物是保护环境的保护伞物种。最后,我将描述为什么我反对沃伦的论点是更有力的论点。在这篇论文中,我将论证沃伦软弱的动物权利立场是错误的,糟糕的环境政策可以从她的论点中产生。玛丽·安妮·沃伦在《强势动物权利立场的困境》一文中,主张一种被称为弱势动物权利立场的动物权利立场。这个动物权利的立场声明所有有知觉的动物都有权利;然而,这些非人类动物的权利没有人类的权利强大。首先,我将用感知来描述沃伦的意思。有知觉的动物是指所有“能够有经验的动物,包括快乐或满足的经验和痛苦、痛苦或挫折的经验”。这可以简化为所有能感觉到疼痛的动物。沃伦的动物权利立场包括各种各样的动物。该职位还为人们提供了一种处理非人类动物权利强度差异的方法。例如,老鼠应该和大象享有同样的权利吗?动物权利的弱势地位表明,不同物种的动物权利可以有不同程度的力量。为了证明这一观点,沃伦指出动物权利的力量是建立在动物心智成熟的基础上的。动物的心智越成熟,承受痛苦的能力就越大,因此它的权利也就越强。没有正当理由杀死老鼠仍然是错误的,但是没有正当理由杀死大象也不是错误的.

新西兰惠灵顿代写:动物权利主张

Mary Anne Warren proposes an animal rights argument known as the weak animal rights position. First, I will be describing Warren’s description of the positions and the arguments in support of it. Next, I will propose the objection to Warren’s position that using sentience as the distinguishing characteristic promotes detrimental environmental policy. Then, I will argue that sentient animals act as an umbrella species that protect the environment. Finally, I will describe why my objection to Warren’s argument is the stronger argument. In this paper, I will argue that Warren’s weak animal rights position is incorrect and that bad environmental policy can result from her argument.In the paper “Difficulties with the Strong Animal Rights Position,” Mary Anne Warren argues for an animal rights position called the weak animal rights position. This animal rights position states that all sentient animals have rights; however, the rights of those nonhuman animals are not as strong as those of humans. First, I will describe what Warren means by sentient. Sentient animals means all animals who are “capable of have experiences, including experiences of pleasure or satisfaction and pain, suffering, or frustration” (Warren, p. 164). This can be simplified to all animals that feel pain. Warren’s animal rights position includes a wide range of animals. The position also gives people a method to deal with differences between nonhuman animals rights strength. For example, should mice be given the same rights as an elephant? The weak animal rights position says that the rights of animals from different species can have levels of strength. To justify this claim Warren states that the strength of animal’s right is based off of the animal’s mental sophistication. The more mentally sophisticated an animal is the greater their ability to suffer is, thus the stronger its rights are. It would still be wrong to kill mice without a justifiable reason, but it would not be a wrong as killing an elephant without a justifiable reason

发表评论

电子邮件地址不会被公开。 必填项已用*标注