历史是对现在和未来具有重大伦理影响的另一个问题。接受或否认过去会影响整个国家和种族的政策和态度。这里可以研究两个比较案例:德国和土耳其。今天的德国对其过去的罪过和错误深感忏悔。在纳粹党统治期间接受了他们的行为不仅是残酷的,但非常可怕,德国今天转向极端悲伤和悔改,使它和大型非法否认大屠杀和引入一项修正案宪法言论自由使纳粹党是非法的。曾经是民族主义者的德国人已经解散了军队，转而训练国家警察部队。对他们罪行的认识显然对德国人的心理产生了深刻而持久的影响。另一方面，土耳其人强烈否认1915年亚美尼亚种族灭绝的存在。土耳其的历史书籍不仅没有提到这一点，而且在其他领域广受尊敬的土耳其历史学家对土耳其过去的罪行出奇地沉默，而且常常否认。土耳其政府本身拒绝承认它对150万亚美尼亚人的暴行。然而，现代的权威人士指出，这可能是有充分理由的。由于土耳其社会对此事的极端否认，承认土耳其的罪行无疑会导致内战，导致政府被迫进行变革。而接受过去的错误可能是至关重要的对建筑一座桥与亚美尼亚人朝着一个更好的关系,接受过去的这个错误很可能永久破坏土耳其政权,形势的变化与西方世界的可怕的结果是一个极端主义政党,其中有很多,来的力量。土耳其政府本身不能提及种族灭绝，因为这样做可能类似于引发一场可能导致整个地区爆发的内战。
新西兰历史学论文代写:历史和未来
History is another AOK with a paramount ethical impact on the present and the future. Accepting, or alternatively, denying the past has consequences that shape the policies and attitudes of entire countries and races. Two comparative cases can be studied here: That of Germany and Turkey. Germany today is nation deeply repentant of its past sins and mistakes. Having accepted their deeds during the rule of the Nazi Party as being not only brutal, but downright horrific, Germany today has swung towards extreme sorrow and repentance, making it by and large illegal to deny the Holocaust and introducing an Amendment to their constitutional free speech which makes the Nazi party illegal. The Germans, a once nationalistic race, have disbanded their army, instead training a national police force. The knowledge of their sins has clearly had a deep and lasting impact on the Germany psyche.The Turks, on the other hand, vehemently deny the very existence of the Armenian Genocide of 1915. Turkish history books not only fail to mention it, but Turkish historians, well respected in other fields, are curiously silent, and often in denial, about the crimes of Turkey’s past. The Turkish government itself refuses to recognize the brutality of its actions against 1.5 million Armenians. Modern day pundits, however, state that there may be good reason for this. An acceptance of Turkish guilt will indubitably lead to civil war due to the extreme denial of Turkish society on the matter, leading to a forced change in the government. While the acceptance of past mistakes may be crucial towards building a bridge towards a better relationship with the Armenians, the acceptance of this past mistake could very well destabilize the Turkish regime permanently, a turn of events with dire results for the Western World were an extremist party, of which there are plenty, to come to power. The Turkish government itself cannot make reference to the Genocide, for to do so is possibly akin to sparking off a civil war which could cause the entire region to erupt.
