反论点的第一个前提集中在施虐者施加的暴力行为上。作为一个施虐者，你必须把受害者看得比人类少，这样才能证明你为了得到有用的信息而犯下的侵犯人权行为是正当的。这一过程贯穿了整个历史，最引人注目的是二战期间纳粹对待犹太人的方式。这些行动不仅会导致战争罪、侵犯人权行为，还会导致法律后果，这些后果将对个人产生长期影响，即刑事指控和心理损害。对于第二个前提，你必须在全球范围内看待人权问题。1948年，联合国起草了《世界人权宣言》。其中一项条款是第5条，其中规定“任何人不得遭受酷刑或残酷、不人道或有辱人格的待遇或处罚。特别是，任何人未经自由同意，不得接受医学或科学实验。”(UDHR,1948)。美利坚合众国是帮助起草和签署这一系列权利的会员国之一。美国政府否认将酷刑作为获取信息的手段，并允许其政府或军方人员使用酷刑，这是违反人权的行为。
新西兰留学生代写:反论点
The first premise of the counterargument is centered on the acts of violence inflicted by the torturer. To be affective as a torturer you have to think of your victim as less than human, in order to justify the human rights violations you have to commit to get any useful information. This process have been seen throughout history, the most notable is the Nazis treatment of the Jews in World War II. These actions can led to not only war crimes, human rights violations but also legal ramifications which will have long term effects on the person i.e. criminal charges and psychological damage.For the second premise you have to look at human rights on a global scale. The United Nations, in 1948, wrote the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. One of the Articles contained in it is Article 5, which states “No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. In particular, no one shall be subjected without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation.” (UDHR, 1948). The United States of America was one of the members who helped draft and signed this collections of rights. By denying to fall it and allowing personnel within its government or military to use torture as a mean to get information the United States government as a whole is guilty of human rights violations.
