约翰·安德森的哲学最鲜明的特点是，它是一个以盎格鲁-撒克逊哲学的分析方法论为主导的世纪的系统哲学。安德森所从事的那种系统建设，无论是概念上的还是语言上的多样性，都受到分析哲学家的反对。相比之下，当时的大陆哲学家对系统哲学更为自在，尽管这种哲学的现象学和存在主义取向并不容易符合安德森的哲学科学观。早在1922年，安德森就将他的系统哲学描述为逻辑、伦理学和美学的“科学”的统一理论，他的哲学特征一直延续到20世纪30年代。对安德森来说，断言逻辑、伦理学或美学是科学，就等于断言它们是可以研究的明确课题，而且它们的研究方法和其他任何科学一样客观。
新西兰留学生论文代写:约翰·安德森的哲学
The most distinctive feature of John Anderson’s philosophy is that it was a systematic philosophy in a century dominated by the analytic methodology in Anglo-Saxon philosophy. System building of the sort Anderson engaged upon was frowned upon by analytic philosophers, whether of the conceptual or linguistic variety. In contrast, continental philosophers at this time were much more at ease with systematic philosophy, although the phenomenological and existential orientation of that philosophy did not fit easily with Anderson’s scientific conception of philosophy. As early as 1922, Anderson was describing his systematic philosophy as a unified theory of the ‘sciences’ of logic, ethics, and aesthetics and this characterization of his philosophy is one that he maintained into the 1930s. For Anderson, to assert that logic, ethics, or aesthetics were sciences was to assert that they were definite subjects that could be studied and that their method of study was as objective as any other science.
