如果华伦天奴对少数民族或军事集团在20世纪最残酷罪行中所扮演的关键角色是正确的，那么种族屠杀和大屠杀似乎并不是它看起来的秘密。如果它的性质可以用清晰的术语来表示，那就可以用大量的例子来说明，那么也许可以采取一些行动来避免它。首先，这是所有种族灭绝科学家的真正目的。顺便说一句，他们关心的是他们的工作在阻止杀戮方面的实际后果，因为他们是纯粹的科学价值(米勒)。总结所有与人类活动有关的现象——特别是在二十世纪和十九世纪全世界的种族灭绝——人们肯定会感到沮丧和沮丧。尽管以讽刺的方式，华伦天奴在他的作品中包括了他所谓的“大规模杀戮”，或“故意杀害大量非战斗人员”(华伦天奴)。你肯定对这些杀戮有多大兴趣?在这里，华伦天奴给出了一个确切的数字:“在5年或更短的时间里，至少有5万故意死亡”，但如果他的理论被证明是有效的，他声称，这个数字也应该减少(瓦伦蒂诺)。主要的要点并不是确切的数字(联合国种族灭绝公约的其中一个说法是，它不需要任何关于种族灭绝研究的具体数字的研究)。最主要的一点是要了解如何大规模杀害无辜、手无寸铁的人成为某些州的政策。
新西兰商科论文代写:华伦天奴
If the Valentino is right about the crucial role of relatively small ethnic or military groupings in the cruelest offences of the twentieth century, then genocide/mass killing may appear not to be the secret it would seem. And if its nature can be seen in lucid terms that refer to a wide range of examples, then maybe something can be carried out to avert it. This is, first of all, the real aim of all genocide scientists. By the way, they care about the pragmatic consequences of their work in stopping the killing as they are with its purely scientific value (Miller). Summing up all phenomena connected with human activity - especially genocide all over the world in the twentieth and nineteenth century – one can surely feel blue and disappointed. Though in a sarcastic manner, Valentino has evaded this partially by including in his work what he calls "mass killing," or "the intentional killing of a massive number of noncombatants" (Valentino). You are surely interested how massive these killings are? Here Valentino gives the definite figure of "at least fifty thousand intentional deaths over the course of five or fewer years," though if his theory is proved to work, he claims, this figure should reduce as well (Valentino). The main point is not in definite number (and one of the cunnings of the UN’s Genocide Convention is that it does not require any researches revealed in specific numbers on a genocide studying). The main point is to understand how the mass killing of guiltless, defenseless people becomes the policy of some states.
